At a Glance
- Tasks: Review academic papers and provide constructive feedback to enhance research quality.
- Company: Join a leading academic journal with a focus on innovation and integrity.
- Benefits: High-paying part-time role with flexible remote work options.
- Why this job: Make a significant impact in the academic community while working from anywhere.
- Qualifications: PhD or equivalent, with extensive publication experience in relevant journals.
- Other info: Ideal for researchers seeking to contribute to scholarly excellence.
The predicted salary is between 30000 - 60000 Β£ per year.
We are currently looking for researchers, retired researchers, and former researchers who can perform peer reviews for journals and publishers.
Note: This is a high β paying part β time job that allows for remote work, please read the recruitment requirements carefully and fill out the application form accurately. Thank you.
WHAT YOU NEED to Have:
- Doctorate (PhD/MD) or equivalent advanced degree in the subject area.
- Published at least 6 papers in SCIE/SSCI/A&HCI journals in the past three years.
- Published at least 25 papers in SCIE/SSCI/A&HCI journals in the past ten years.
- Thorough understanding of research methodologies and ethical principles within the relevant discipline.
- Excellent analytical and critical thinking skills.
- Strong written communication skills with the ability to provide clear, concise, and constructive feedback.
- Ability to adhere to deadlines and manage time effectively.
- Commitment to maintaining confidentiality and objectivity.
- Prior experience as a peer reviewer for academic journals is highly desirable.
- Familiarity with online manuscript submission and review systems.
WHAT YOU WILL DO:
- Assess Novelty: Assess whether the manuscript is original and adds new knowledge or insights to the field of study.
- Evaluate Study Design and Methodology: Assess whether the study design and methods are appropriate, comprehensive, and clearly described to ensure that the research can be accurately reproduced in the future.
- Literature Review: Check whether the manuscript thoroughly incorporates and cites relevant, up-to-date research in the field.
- Analyse Results and Conclusions: Evaluates whether the results are presented clearly and appropriately, and whether the conclusions are supported by the data and significant to the field.
- Providing Constructive Feedback: Provide constructive feedback, suggesting improvements or highlighting any flaws, omissions, or ethical concerns.
- Recommend Publication: Based on your evaluation, the journal editor will decide whether the manuscript should be accepted, revised, or rejected.
PhD Peer Reviewer needed: Professor of Business Management employer: Fengkai Group Co., Limited
Contact Detail:
Fengkai Group Co., Limited Recruiting Team
StudySmarter Expert Advice π€«
We think this is how you could land PhD Peer Reviewer needed: Professor of Business Management
β¨Tip Number 1
Network like a pro! Reach out to fellow researchers and academics in your field. Attend conferences, webinars, or even local meet-ups. The more connections we make, the better our chances of landing that peer reviewer gig!
β¨Tip Number 2
Show off your expertise! Create a personal website or LinkedIn profile showcasing your published papers and peer review experience. This gives potential employers a quick glimpse of what we bring to the table.
β¨Tip Number 3
Donβt be shy about applying! We encourage you to fill out the application form on our website accurately. Highlight your relevant experience and skills that match the job description to stand out from the crowd.
β¨Tip Number 4
Prepare for interviews by brushing up on common peer review questions. Think about how you would assess novelty or evaluate study design. Being ready to discuss these topics will show weβre serious about the role!
We think you need these skills to ace PhD Peer Reviewer needed: Professor of Business Management
Some tips for your application π«‘
Read the Job Description Carefully: Before you start your application, make sure to read through the job description thoroughly. We want to see that you understand what we're looking for, so highlight your relevant experience and qualifications that match our requirements.
Showcase Your Experience: When filling out the application form, be sure to showcase your experience as a peer reviewer and your publication history. We love seeing specific examples of your work, so donβt hold back on sharing your achievements!
Be Clear and Concise: We appreciate clear and concise communication, especially in written applications. Make sure your responses are straightforward and to the point, while still providing enough detail to demonstrate your expertise.
Apply Through Our Website: Donβt forget to apply through our website! Itβs the best way for us to receive your application and ensures youβre considered for the role. Plus, itβs super easy to navigate!
How to prepare for a job interview at Fengkai Group Co., Limited
β¨Know Your Stuff
Make sure you brush up on your research methodologies and ethical principles. Be ready to discuss your published papers and how they relate to the role. This will show that youβre not just a qualified candidate, but also someone who is genuinely engaged in the field.
β¨Showcase Your Experience
Highlight your prior experience as a peer reviewer. Prepare specific examples of feedback you've provided in the past and how it improved the manuscripts. This will demonstrate your analytical skills and your ability to provide constructive criticism.
β¨Be Ready for Scenario Questions
Expect questions that assess how you would handle specific situations, like evaluating a poorly designed study or providing feedback on a manuscript with ethical concerns. Think through these scenarios beforehand so you can respond confidently.
β¨Communicate Clearly
Since strong written communication skills are essential, practice articulating your thoughts clearly and concisely. You might even want to prepare a brief summary of a paper youβve reviewed recently to showcase your ability to distil complex information into clear feedback.