At a Glance
- Tasks: Review academic papers and provide constructive feedback to enhance research quality.
- Company: Join a leading academic community dedicated to advancing knowledge.
- Benefits: High-paying part-time role with flexible remote work options.
- Why this job: Make a significant impact in academia while working from anywhere.
- Qualifications: PhD or equivalent, with extensive publication experience in reputable journals.
- Other info: Ideal for researchers seeking to contribute to the academic field.
The predicted salary is between 36000 - 60000 £ per year.
We are currently looking for researchers, retired researchers, and former researchers who can perform peer reviews for journals and publishers.
Note: This is a high – paying part – time job that allows for remote work, please read the recruitment requirements carefully and fill out the application form accurately. Thank you.
WHAT YOU NEED to Have:
- Doctorate (PhD/MD) or equivalent advanced degree in the subject area.
- Published at least 6 papers in SCIE/SSCI/A&HCI journals in the past three years.
- Published at least 25 papers in SCIE/SSCI/A&HCI journals in the past ten years.
- Thorough understanding of research methodologies and ethical principles within the relevant discipline.
- Excellent analytical and critical thinking skills.
- Strong written communication skills with the ability to provide clear, concise, and constructive feedback.
- Ability to adhere to deadlines and manage time effectively.
- Commitment to maintaining confidentiality and objectivity.
- Prior experience as a peer reviewer for academic journals is highly desirable.
- Familiarity with online manuscript submission and review systems.
WHAT YOU WILL DO:
- Assess Novelty: Assess whether the manuscript is original and adds new knowledge or insights to the field of study.
- Evaluate Study Design and Methodology: Assess whether the study design and methods are appropriate, comprehensive, and clearly described to ensure that the research can be accurately reproduced in the future.
- Literature Review: Check whether the manuscript thoroughly incorporates and cites relevant, up-to-date research in the field.
- Analyse Results and Conclusions: Evaluates whether the results are presented clearly and appropriately, and whether the conclusions are supported by the data and significant to the field.
- Providing Constructive Feedback: Provide constructive feedback, suggesting improvements or highlighting any flaws, omissions, or ethical concerns.
- Recommend Publication: Based on your evaluation, the journal editor will decide whether the manuscript should be accepted, revised, or rejected.
PhD Peer Reviewer needed: Professor of Business Management employer: Fengkai Group Co., Limited
Contact Detail:
Fengkai Group Co., Limited Recruiting Team
StudySmarter Expert Advice 🤫
We think this is how you could land PhD Peer Reviewer needed: Professor of Business Management
✨Tip Number 1
Network like a pro! Reach out to fellow researchers and academics in your field. Attend conferences or webinars, and don’t be shy about introducing yourself. You never know who might have a lead on a peer reviewer position!
✨Tip Number 2
Showcase your expertise! Update your online profiles with your publications and experience. Make sure your LinkedIn or ResearchGate is looking sharp, as potential employers will likely check you out before reaching out.
✨Tip Number 3
Be proactive! Don’t just wait for job postings to come to you. Reach out directly to journals or publishers that interest you. Express your interest in peer reviewing and share your qualifications – it could lead to opportunities!
✨Tip Number 4
Apply through our website! We’ve got a streamlined application process that makes it easy for you to get your foot in the door. Fill out the form accurately and showcase your skills – we’re excited to see what you bring to the table!
We think you need these skills to ace PhD Peer Reviewer needed: Professor of Business Management
Some tips for your application 🫡
Read the Job Description Carefully: Before you start your application, make sure to read through the job description thoroughly. We want to see that you understand what we're looking for, so tailor your application to highlight how your experience matches our requirements.
Showcase Your Experience: When filling out the application form, be sure to showcase your relevant experience. Mention your published papers and any prior peer review work you've done. We love seeing concrete examples of your skills in action!
Be Clear and Concise: We appreciate clear communication, so keep your application straightforward and to the point. Avoid jargon unless it's necessary, and make sure your writing is easy to follow. This will help us see your strong written communication skills right away.
Apply Through Our Website: Don't forget to apply through our website! It’s the best way to ensure your application gets to us directly. Plus, it helps us keep everything organised, making the process smoother for everyone involved.
How to prepare for a job interview at Fengkai Group Co., Limited
✨Know Your Stuff
Make sure you brush up on your research methodologies and ethical principles. Given the role requires a thorough understanding of these areas, being able to discuss them confidently will show that you're the right fit for the job.
✨Showcase Your Experience
Prepare to talk about your previous peer review experiences. Highlight specific examples where your feedback made a difference or improved a manuscript. This will demonstrate your analytical skills and ability to provide constructive criticism.
✨Familiarise Yourself with the Process
Get to know the online manuscript submission and review systems commonly used in academic publishing. Being able to discuss these systems during the interview will show that you're proactive and ready to hit the ground running.
✨Be Clear and Concise
Practice articulating your thoughts clearly and concisely. Strong written communication skills are essential for this role, so being able to express your ideas effectively in the interview will set you apart from other candidates.